Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 April 23

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< April 22 April 24 >

April 23[edit]

Template:TV.com[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TV.com is well past its prime, now patchy with large parts defunct, and no longer considered a good external link per this discussion, as better alternatives exist. Deletion of this template family and removal of its uses is desired. — Bilorv (talk) 12:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete – if TV.com is now defunct, which appears to be the case, there is no reason to keep this suite of templates around any longer. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Per nom. Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:17, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: if deleted, please also delete Category:TV.com template using numeric id, Category:TV.com template with unexpected input, and Category:TV.com template missing ID and not in Wikidata. In addition, it would be very helpful if a bot can remove manual entries (found with insource:"at Tv.com"). --Gonnym (talk) 14:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    This search is probably pretty close to what you would want. Izno (talk) 21:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    That brings a lot of citation template usages. insource:"at Tv.com" is similar to what the above templates use. --Gonnym (talk) 22:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per nom. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 18:06, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Somewhat of a bittersweet moment, but I agree that since the site has been defunct for a while now, it should not be included when better alternatives exist to replace it. Aoba47 (talk) 19:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per nom. Since that site has been inactive for so long, I don't think it should be allowed on Wikipedia anymore. AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and second Gonnym's nominations. – DarkGlow • 20:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:10, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Well past being useful. 70.31.124.168 (talk) 06:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Chompy Ace 10:05, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per nom. Pahiy (talk) 21:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. I hate to say it, I really do, but having not browsed this site for several years, it's clear after viewing it in 2021 that it's not what it used to be. — Paper Luigi T • C 00:00, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete TV.com has been a very poor quality website for years. Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 06:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. TheSkinsAdded (talk) 17:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I normally don't want to just follow the pack and repeat what was aforementioned by other users, but here I actually honestly agree. Looking at TV.com again, I have noticed that for one, it is currently inactive since "early 2018", and for two, it "emphasized user-generated content". And three, I believe there are some better, more up-to-date sources out there for listing TV information for television shows across the English-speaking Western World. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 04:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. - DoubleCross (‡) 16:17, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Saint Louis FC squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

no current squad; unnecessary template Joeykai (talk) 12:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Especially when it is from a defunct team. Yoshiman6464 [[User talk 18:07, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - club is defunct so 'current' squad has no purpose. GiantSnowman 11:32, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leaning towards delete - I was about to say "keep", but then I realized much of the team moved elsewhere to other sports teams, and also of course because that sports team became defunct. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 04:34, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_April_23&oldid=1020695496"