User talk:Elizzzzz

Welcome![edit]

Hi Elizzzzz! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve James Dring[edit]

Hello, Elizzzzz,

Thank you for creating James Dring.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi Elizzz, well done on your new article. In my opinion, it would benefit from inclusion in additional appropriate categories and by being added to appropriate Wikiprojects. Good job!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Bastun:. I will try to figure it out by adding appropriate categories. Elizzzzz (talk) 17:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Martin Woodall - Headshot.jpeg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Martin Woodall - Headshot.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.linkedin.com/in/martinwoodall/ and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Josey Wales^Parley 19:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Conflict of Interest[edit]

Hello, Elizzzzz. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Martin Woodall, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Josey Wales^Parley 20:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Bradshaw has been accepted[edit]

Jacob Bradshaw, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Prodraxis _(talk) 03:31, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jacob Bradshaw[edit]

The article Jacob Bradshaw has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 03:44, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Johann Siegmundt Sultzberger (February 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aintabli was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Johann Siegmundt Sultzberger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aintabli (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elizzzzz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aintabli (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 82.13.47.210 (talk) 22:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. Got it, I will make sure to include a summary for each edit. Elizzzzz (talk) 22:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; this is to aid the patrollers. It can also help in recalling one's own contributions. I am gnoming around presently, and can't remember edits without a prompt, often

.--82.13.47.210 (talk) 13:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your thoughtful explanation. I appreciate your willingness to assist the patrollers and highlight the benefits of the proposed solution. Your proactive approach is commendable, and I am grateful for your offer to help. Let's proceed with addressing the issue together. Elizzzzz (talk) 13:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ChargeFinder Logo.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:ChargeFinder Logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 82.13.47.210 (talk) 03:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has been sorted out by an administrator who chose a different licence and cleaned-up the details.--82.13.47.210 (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Refbombing[edit]

Please read WP:THREE and WP:CITEKILL which both, although essays, have relevance to what your inexperience is generating at ChargeFinder; in particular, this from Lonely Planet is only what Wikipedia refers to as a trivial passing mention, being merely five words. If you mouse-hover over the template/blue active text appended after the ref number, it will reveal the reason, (known as a tooltip).

Wikipedia sources need to reflect substantial and ongoing coverage in reliable publications to comply with the basic, but essential, notability requirement.

You should also avoid stacking inline citation boxes like that, and particularly in the lede, as it signifies inexperience and/or desperation/argumentation. Lede refs are optional, but not essential, depending on length of article - some editors will move out to section, leaving 'clean', unbroken prose.-- 82.13.47.210 (talk) 18:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback on my editing. I appreciate your insights and will take your suggestions into account as I continue to work on the article. Elizzzzz (talk) 19:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hope it helps. There is much to learn. Over the years, Wikipedia has become highly-structured and complicated, even for me with 11 years I have to think hard and sometimes get things wrong. No-one said it would be easy, or could be achieved quickly

. rgds,--82.13.47.210 (talk) 00:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WhosHere Plus moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to WhosHere Plus. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Most sources are from download websites. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CreamyP (talk) 09:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @CreamyP. I will work on the draft and will try to find additional sources. Elizzzzz (talk) 09:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:WhosHere Plus has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:WhosHere Plus. Thanks! ANU^writes 06:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WhosHere Plus (March 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see comment made just now by another editor. In addition, I do not see references to strong sources--they all strike me as chatty notes on websites, not real discussion in reliable and strong publications.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WhosHere Plus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 21:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snapmuse (March 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Snapmuse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

firefly ( t · c ) 14:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Dring for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Dring is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Dring until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 14:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philipp Herold (April 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xkalponik was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philipp Herold and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

X (talk) 20:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]